Our partners
Santa Cruz · Galápagos · Ecuador

Galápagos Habitat
Restoration Institute

Restoring what the islands were

Founded by Marcelo Chávez García, MD, PhD

Current research
Scroll down to fly in · scroll up to go back

ECUADOR

1,053 kmto the archipelago

GALÁPAGOS ISLANDS

Galápagos Habitat Restoration Institute

GHRI seal Santa Cruz · Galápagos · Ecuador

Restoring what
the islands were

A Galápagos nonprofit clearing invasive species from the highlands and rebuilding the endemic cloud forest — and making the biomass it removes worth something to the people who live here.

This is also
the Galápagos.

Six hundred metres above the beaches lies the part almost no visitor sees: the endemic cloud forest — and, growing into it, the species that are replacing it.

This is what is
replacing it.

Rubus niveus — hill blackberry, introduced in 1968. It now covers an estimated 30,000 hectares of highland.

01 / ThreatRubus niveus

A silent emergency

A hill blackberry plant growing at the edge of pasture in the Santa Cruz highlands Rubus niveus — hill blackberry · invasive

While the world watches the marine reserve, the highlands are being quietly smothered — the endemic Scalesia forest replaced by a wall of thorns.

Rubus niveus — hill blackberry, introduced in 1968 — now stands across an estimated 30,000 hectares of highland (see what that looks like →) in thickets four metres high. What it replaces is a forest that exists nowhere else: Scalesia pedunculata, a daisy that became a tree. Our seal is a Scalesia leaf. It is not decoration — it is the thing we are trying to put back.

Where blackberry stands, Scalesia does not regenerate at all. Not slowly — not at all: mature trees die and nothing replaces them, and on the present trajectory the species could reach quasi-extinction within about twenty years (Riegl et al., 2023). Removal works. It only works if it is sustained.1

The forest is not the only casualty. The Western Santa Cruz Giant Tortoise, Chelonoidis porteri, is Critically Endangered — around 3,400 animals remain2. Every year they migrate between highland nesting grounds and the arid lowlands, a route their ancestors have walked for millennia. Blackberry now walls those corridors and degrades the nesting ground at the end of them. An animal that has crossed these islands since before human memory finds its oldest paths closed.

Guava, quinine tree and Lantana compound the damage. Over 870 introduced plant species now stand against fewer than 600 natives — many already threatened. This is the problem GHRI was created to address.

Sources for this section
  1. Riegl, B., Walentowitz, A., Sevilla, C., Chango, R. & Jäger, H. (2023). Invasive blackberry outcompetes the endemic Galapagos tree daisy Scalesia pedunculata. Ecological Applications 33(4): e2846. doi:10.1002/eap.2846 ↩
  2. IUCN Red List — Western Santa Cruz Giant Tortoise (Chelonoidis porteri), Critically Endangered; population estimated at 3,400 (Cayot et al., 2017). ↩

02 / Scalehow big is 30,000 hectares?

A number no one
can picture

Hectares mean nothing until you stand them next to something you know. So we did.

Currently, only 1% of the original Scalesia forest remains. This surviving area represents merely a fraction of the forest’s historical extent, which originally covered approximately 10% of the island.

Source: Charles Darwin Foundation

What is the extent of the invasion?

The same 30,000 hectares can be seen a different way — relative infestation pressure by elevation zone and island.

Inside 3 figures · 0 of 22 opened on this site

You have opened 0 of 22 figures and films on this site

30,000ha ≈ 300 km² · 116 sq mi
1 species · of 870 introduced plants on record

That is 5.1× the size of Manhattan.

Each outline below is one Manhattan. Red is invaded ground.

Blackberry is only the fastest invader — guava already covers more ground. Switch the others on to see the real footprint.

View the figures as a table
Invasive species on record — extent and impact
Species Extent Since & impact
BlackberryRubus niveus 30,000 ha Since 1968 · archipelago-wide
Impact 5/5 — transformer
GuavaPsidium guajava 40,000+ ha Since the late 1800s · Isabela
Impact 4/5 — monodominant forest
Quinine treeCinchona pubescens 11,000+ ha Since 1946 · Santa Cruz
Impact 5/5 — ecosystem engineer
Compare to

5.1× the invaded area equals Manhattan · one outline = 59 km²

yrs

Aerial view of a volcanic crater in the Isabela highlands, with the coastline beyond Isabela · volcanic highlands

03 / WHY RUBUS

Why is Rubus such a problem?

By forming impenetrable thickets, Rubus both displaces native wildlife from their natural habitat and physically blocks their nesting sites and vital migration routes — journeys they have made for millennia.

Inside 3 figures · 0 of 22 opened on this site

You have opened 0 of 22 figures and films on this site

04 / HOW IT IS CONTROLLED NOW

Six years, and it never ends

The documented conventional regime on Santa Cruz: cut, then three foliar herbicide passes, then a widening interval that never closes. This is containment, not removal — and it is the baseline every other approach is measured against.

Inside 1 figure · 0 of 22 opened on this site

You have opened 0 of 22 figures and films on this site

05 / THE PROPOSED SOLUTION

So what is the proposed solution?

We propose a combination of what would appear to be unrelated technologies — and we bring them together to restore the Galápagos ecosystem.

Inside 6 figures · 3 films, 65 stops · 0 of 22 opened on this site

You have opened 0 of 22 figures and films on this site

06 / PREVENTING RELAPSE

But how do we stop it growing back?

Cutting is the “easy half”. Everything above answers removal — and conventional practice answers the rest with herbicide in the first months, then manual passes, for years. Directed cattle grazing is the alternative we are testing.

Inside 1 figure · 0 of 22 opened on this site

You have opened 0 of 22 figures and films on this site

Missed how it is controlled today? ← go back

07 / RESTORATION

And how do we bring the forest back?

Removal is answered, and so is relapse. This is the half that has to hold on its own once we stop coming — endemics multiplied, planted, protected, then released.

Inside 1 figure · 0 of 22 opened on this site

You have opened 0 of 22 figures and films on this site

08 / ENCLOSURE

How do we stop the cattle eating the young plantlets?

The same herd the trial puts on the blackberry regrowth would browse the replacement. The trial will test two ways to stop it, and adopt whichever works better.

Inside 3 figures · 0 of 22 opened on this site

You have opened 0 of 22 figures and films on this site

09 / THE OUTCOME

And what do we hope for?

Cattle are withdrawn, and the plot is expected to hold itself as the canopy closes. This is the step with the least evidence behind it, and the one every step before it is for.

Inside 1 figure · 0 of 22 opened on this site

You have opened 0 of 22 figures and films on this site

10 / Methodtwo loops

The islands import
the next invasion

About 75 per cent of the islands’ agricultural food supply comes from the mainland, and every cargo can carry the next invader. That steady supply discourages local farming, and where farms are abandoned, invasive plants spread fast: the land that could feed the islands is lost to the invaders already here.

Two loops through the same highland farmland. The loop that endangers: farmland taken by invaders, so less food is grown on the islands, so more food is shipped in (75% of the agricultural food supply in 2017, 95% projected for 2037), and new species arrive with it (1,579 recorded so far), which spread into the farmland. The loop we are building: remove the invader, restore native plants, valorize the biomass as feed, food and materials, so that more is made on the islands and less is shipped in.

One piece of land, two loops. Left to the invaders, the highland farmland feeds the first; worked again, it feeds the second.

Remove. Restore.
Valorize.

Most removal stops when the money stops, because it produces nothing. This one is built so that what is pulled out becomes material with a market wherever it safely can, and a fixed share of what it earns funds the next hectare.

75% → 95%

of the islands’ agricultural food supply came from the mainland in 2017. With no change in food policy, the model projects 95% by 2037.

Sampedro et al. 2020 · Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems

1,579

alien species introduced to Galápagos by people, 1,476 of them established. Just over half arrived by accident: most on plants and plant material, then on planes and boats, and on goods, especially fruit and vegetables.

Toral-Granda et al. 2017 · PLoS ONE

94% → 7%

native vegetation outside the National Park on Santa Cruz. By 2018, 67% of that land was farmland and 26% invasive species, and where farms were abandoned the invaders spread fast.

Alomía Herrera et al. 2022 · Land

5.9% · 33.7%

mean cover of invasive guava on farms in Santa Cruz and San Cristóbal, by the owner’s main income. Worked farms carry far less of the invader.

Acosta-Vásconez et al. 2025 · Biological Invasions

Sources for this panel
  1. Sampedro C, Pizzitutti F, Quiroga D, Walsh SJ, Mena CF (2020). Food supply system dynamics in the Galapagos Islands: agriculture, livestock and imports. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 35(3): 234–248. doi.org/10.1017/S1742170518000534
  2. Toral-Granda MV, Causton CE, Jäger H, Trueman M, Izurieta JC, Araujo E, Cruz M, Zander KK, Izurieta A, Garnett ST (2017). Alien species pathways to the Galapagos Islands, Ecuador. PLoS ONE 12(9): e0184379. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184379
  3. Alomía Herrera I, Paque R, Maertens M, Vanacker V (2022). History of land cover change on Santa Cruz Island, Galapagos. Land 11(7): 1017. doi.org/10.3390/land11071017
  4. Acosta-Vásconez N, Jäger H, Schneider UA, Santos F, Kabir KH, et al. (2025). The socioeconomic drivers of invasive plant cover in rural Galapagos. Biological Invasions 27: 204. doi.org/10.1007/s10530-025-03662-w
Aerial view of invaded scrub covering the volcanic cones of the Santa Cruz highlands
Aerial view of farmed paddocks and lanes on the agricultural belt near Bellavista

The invasion
is up here.

So we start
down here.

11 / FieldSanta Cruz highlands

Where the work begins

GHRI’s first operations are on private farmland in the Santa Cruz highlands, with the families who ranch it. That is deliberate: much of the blackberry grows there, it needs no protected-area permit, and it lets us prove the method before proposing it inside the National Park.

First target

Where we start

Rubus is where the cutting starts, and the resin pieces made from it are the first thing this model has produced. The revenue is small. That is also the point — it pays for the step after it.

That step is Leucaena leucocephala, in the transition belt above Puerto Ayora. The trees are large, and taking them down cost money we did not have until the first pieces sold.

Leucaena is aggressive and allelopathic. Elsewhere in the tropics it is valued cattle fodder, but only where the animals carry the rumen bacterium that breaks down its toxin — and ranchers here describe the opposite: cattle driven onto it in the dry season lose hair and lose weight. So for now it goes into durable objects rather than feed, each piece carrying the GPS coordinates of the tree it came from.

Every removal is photographed, filmed and geolocated. No quantified estimate of Leucaena’s extent in Galápagos exists — nobody has measured how much ground it holds — so our removal records are the beginning of the first quantitative dataset on this invasion.

Removal Rubus · Psidium · Cinchona

Removal zones are chosen by field survey and ecological mapping, with the Dirección del Parque Nacional Galápagos. Every site is documented — area cleared, biomass recovered, native response — so the method can be audited and repeated rather than merely asserted.

Valorization

Removed biomass goes to productive use rather than a burn pile. The routes below are at different stages and we are honest about which is where. The principle is constant: restoration that generates local value is restoration a community has reason to continue.

A wire fence line dividing pasture in the Bellavista agricultural belt, Santa Cruz Bellavista — the farmed boundary where removal begins
Turquoise lagoon set into black lava rock on the Santa Cruz coast Santa Cruz · lava-rock lagoon

Research programmewhat GHRI is developing and testing

Saving Scalesia: the first in vitro protocol for the genus

  1. 01In vitro propagation of ScalesiaProtocol v1 · authorisation in progress
  2. 02Virtual-fencing field trial, with NofenceTest collar in hand · trial site agreed
  3. 03Native Galápagos fungiProposed · nothing started yet

Scalesia, the tree daisies often called the “Darwin’s finches of the plant world”, once formed the cloud forest of the Galápagos highlands. On Santa Cruz only 1–3% of that forest remains, as published. Invasive blackberry is displacing what is left, and about 95% of Scalesia pedunculata seedlings die in the field.

No in vitro propagation protocol has ever been published for any Scalesia species. The only previous attempt, by the Galápagos National Park in 2006, stopped at establishment. GHRI is developing the first.

We start with a training set (Psidium galapageium as a feasibility control, then S. pedunculata and S. affinis) so the method exists before it is needed for the rarest species, such as S. retroflexa, whose seed viability is under 7%. Tissue culture lets us capture and bank specific genotypes, which seed cannot do in a genus whose islands hold genetically distinct populations.

Our commitments: nursery-grown plants only, no wild collection; no genetic modification; the finished protocol goes to the Galápagos National Park free of charge and will be published, negative results included. During the protocol phase, material moves one way and nothing living returns to the islands; plants for the highlands will be produced in Galápagos once the protocol exists and is authorised.

Bench work is carried out with Invitrolab, our partner laboratory in Quito. Authorisation under Ecuador’s 2026 research regulation is in progress with the Galápagos National Park Directorate.

Sources: Walentowitz et al. 2021, PLOS ONE 16:e0258467 (seedling mortality) · Riegl et al. 2023, Ecological Applications 33(4):e2846 (blackberry displacement) · Izquierdo 2006, Lyonia 9(2):57–62 (the 2006 attempt) · Jaramillo Díaz, Calle-Loor & Sevilla 2025, Oryx 59(4):411–417 (S. retroflexa seed viability)

02 · The virtual-fencing field trial

Field trial · with Nofence

Virtual fencing: can directed grazing keep blackberry from coming back?

Clearing blackberry is the easy half; holding the ground is the hard one. We are testing whether cattle held by GPS collars inside virtual boundaries, and put onto cleared ground when the soft regrowth appears, can keep it from re-establishing, on Santa Cruz farmland used by Critically Endangered giant tortoises. It is a question, not a result: the one controlled cattle trial on a blackberry we know of, in Florida, found the cattle avoided it.

  • PartnerNofence AS, Norway. Letter of intent signed on 30 September 2026.
  • The collarNofence C2.5. The first unit was handed over in Madrid on 12 October 2026, for an on-site test in October and November.
  • Trial siteFinca Miramar 2, Bellavista, Santa Cruz: 154 ha of private farmland. Agreement reached with the landowner; written agreement in drafting.
  • FundingA full-season trial with 30 collars, proposed to the Mohamed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund in October 2026. Decision expected in December.
Benjamin Mazin of Nofence handing the first C2.5 virtual-fencing collar to Marcelo Chávez García in Madrid
Madrid, 12 October 2026: Benjamin Mazin, Public Affairs Manager at Nofence, hands the first C2.5 collar to Marcelo Chávez García.
The trial site on Santa Cruz. Drag the map, or use + and − to zoom.

03 · A proposed research line

Presentation titled Funga of the Galápagos Islands at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Brussels, 9 October 2026: “Funga of the Galápagos Islands”, presented at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel.
A jacket made from a mycelium-based material A boot made from a mycelium-based material

Mycelium-based materials, Brussels, October 2026: the kind of use the research would test with native strains.

Proposed · nothing started yet

Native Galápagos fungi

The Galápagos funga is poorly documented. We propose to find out which fungi already live in the Santa Cruz highlands, and whether local strains could turn invasive woody biomass into useful materials without bringing a single new organism to the islands. That is a hypothesis: no strain has been tested for it.

In October 2026 we presented the proposal to the Research Group of Microbiology at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), and funding is being sought. Any commercial application would be carried out by Galápagos Bio-Valorización, a separate company owned by GHRI’s founder.

12 / Collaboration

Technical
collaboration

GHRI works with specialist partners whose technology and expertise shape our protocols directly. Each description is drawn from the partner’s own published work or written commitments. We do not name a collaborator before they have agreed to be named.

Invitrolab logo
Plant tissue culture

Plant tissue culture laboratory in Quito; GHRI’s partner for the Scalesia in vitro protocol. Agreement reached April 2026; collaboration documents signed.

Visit invitrolab.lat ↗
Scientific advice · in vitro

The Conservatoire botanique national de Brest (France) advises GHRI’s Scalesia programme on protocol design, acclimatisation and long-term maintenance of clonal lines. In 1993 Brest achieved a world first in conservation: it regenerated Cylindrocline lorencei, a Mauritian plant already extinct in the wild, from seeds that could no longer germinate, and it is now returning the species to Mauritius after invasive guava was cleared from its habitat. It is the same sequence GHRI follows in Galápagos: remove the invader, restore the habitat, then reintroduce.

Visit cbnbrest.fr ↗
Nofence logo
Virtual fencing · letter of intent

Nofence AS (Norway) develops and supplies virtual fencing systems for livestock: GPS-enabled collars and a mobile application keep animals inside boundaries drawn on a map, without physical fences. In a letter of intent signed in September 2026, Nofence stated it is prepared to supply collars for GHRI’s virtual-fencing pilot on Santa Cruz, on commercial terms, once the project secures funding and authorisation, and to provide technical guidance. The first test collar was handed over in Madrid in October 2026.

Visit nofence.no ↗
Sylvan Bio logo
Scientific Partner

Sylvan Bio Inc. is the source of Pleurotus ostreatus strain SPX-281 — a patented, sporeless cultivar selected for its biosafety profile in sensitive island ecosystems and suitability for the Galápagos’ phytosanitary approval framework.

Visit sylvan.bio ↗

Institutional coordination

GHRI's work is coordinated with the Galápagos institutions responsible for the land and the biosecurity framework it operates under. Coordination is not endorsement, and we list it as what it is.

  • Dirección del Parque Nacional Galápagos — regulatory authority for protected areas; authorisation for our in vitro programme under Ecuador’s 2026 research regulation is in progress with the Directorate.
  • Agencia de Bioseguridad para Galápagos — biosecurity regulator; process opened October 2025, Pest Risk Analysis filed May 2026, awaiting the normative framework the Agency confirmed in June 2026 must be developed first (Oficio ABG-DVCB-2026-0319-O). See Governance & transparency for the full sequence.
  • Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganadería — briefed on the project.
Aerial view of a research station compound in coastal scrub above Puerto Ayora Puerto Ayora · research station area
GHRI seal

13 / Institute

Built on science,
rooted in the islands

The Galápagos Habitat Restoration Institute is a Galápagos-based nonprofit working on invasive species removal and endemic ecosystem restoration on Santa Cruz. GHRI is being constituted as a Fundación under Ecuadorian law (name reserved by the Ministry of Environment and Energy, 24 September 2026; legal personality expected November 2026). We would rather tell you that than let you find it.

GHRI works with local communities, landowners and conservation authorities, and will publish the results of its field and research programmes.

How the work is funded. We remove what damages this ecosystem whether or not it pays. Value is not what decides where we cut — it is what pays for cutting again next year. The full funding structure, the related-party position and the revenue commitment are set out on the governance page.

My family settled in Santa Cruz in the early 1980s. I spent my childhood exploring the highlands — the Scalesia cloud forests, the paths the giant tortoises follow between their nesting grounds and the lowlands, the volcanic soil that felt like it could grow anything. Those forests were the ordinary world of my childhood, and I assumed they were permanent.

They were not. I graduated as an M.D. from the Central University in Quito, took a PhD in biomedical sciences at the Université Libre de Bruxelles, and in 2016 joined Stanford as a research scientist at the Baxter Laboratory for Stem Cell Biology. My work has been built on precision — mass spectrometry, proteomics, signalling pathways, the molecular mechanisms of disease: taking a system apart and finding the step that fails.

On visits home I watched the highlands change. The forests I remembered were being consumed by something I can only describe as an infiltrating tumour: Rubus niveus in dense, impenetrable thickets, smothering the endemic Scalesia and closing the corridors the tortoises have walked for millennia. My first instinct was not botanical; it was medical. And the response I found was a cycle of clearing that stopped whenever the money did.

The turning point came from a hobby growing mushrooms at home. Fungi secrete enzymes that break down lignin, the exact woody polymer making up the invasive blackberry. I realized we could feed the thing destroying the Galápagos to an organism that turns it into food.

After two decades building a career on evidence, I came home convinced that the same rigour can — and must — be applied here. It comes from one conviction: conservation that asks a community to sacrifice is abandoned the moment the funding stops. We are galapagueños; my family has been part of this place for more than forty years, and we are not transient visitors to this problem. We need to build our livelihoods by keeping these islands intact — make that work, and the work continues without us. We will not pass this on unsolved.

GHRI is my answer.

EMBO Long-Term Fellowship

European Molecular Biology Organization

Pew Latin American Fellows Award

Pew Charitable Trusts

Cabeaux-Jacobs Award

Belgian American Educational Foundation

Empty white-sand cove with turquoise water, backed by dark lava rock and scrub Santa Cruz · undeveloped coast

14 / Team

On the ground

The highlands are not a field site GHRI visits. They are where our field lead has lived and worked all his adult life.

Portrait of Fredy García, GHRI Field Operations Lead

Fredy García

Field Operations Lead

Bellavista · Santa Cruz highlands

Fredy has worked the Santa Cruz highlands all his adult life, in cattle and on the land. He knows where Rubus niveus is thickest, which properties it has taken, and which gates open — knowledge no survey substitutes for and no visitor acquires.

He leads GHRI's field operations: removal logistics, site access, and day-to-day coordination with the ranching families whose land the invasion crosses. His standing with local ranchers, the Dirección del Parque Nacional Galápagos and the GAD Municipal de Santa Cruz is the reason this work can reach private land — where much of the blackberry actually grows.

He also farms. On the family smallholding in Bellavista they raise poultry and grow plátano and yuca to replace feed corn shipped from the mainland — every sack of which is a possible route for disease into a population of endemic birds. It is GHRI's argument at landscape scale, worked out on one farm.

Field notes

What we are doing
right now

Short, dated, unedited. If a month is quiet, it says so.

2026-10Formally requested the Galápagos National Park Directorate’s letter of support (carta de aval) as national supporting institution for our in vitro programme, with the research proposal attached, under Ecuador’s 2026 research regulation (CIUDADANO-CIU-2026-65748, 13 October 2026). Researcher registration with MINEDEC filed on 19 October.
2026-10Applied to the Mohamed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund for a one-season field trial: virtual-fenced cattle grazing, testing whether it can keep invasive blackberry from regrowing on Santa Cruz farmland used by Critically Endangered giant tortoises. Decision expected in December.
2026-10Madrid: collected the first Nofence C2.5 collar from Benjamin Mazin (Nofence) for an on-site test on Santa Cruz in October–November (12 October 2026).
2026-10Brussels: presented the Institute’s programme and a proposed research line on native Galápagos fungi to the Research Group of Microbiology at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), 9 October 2026.
2026-09Nofence (Norway) signed a letter of intent to support our virtual-fencing pilot on Santa Cruz (30 September 2026).
2026-09The Conservatoire botanique national de Brest (France) agreed to advise our Scalesia in vitro programme.
2026-09First draft of our Scalesia in vitro protocol completed (v1, 28 September 2026), built from the published literature.
2026-09Name of the Fundación reserved with the Ministry of Environment and Energy (24 September 2026); legal personality expected in November 2026.
2026-09The Galápagos National Park Directorate replied to our request (Oficio MAE-PNG/DIR-2026-0937-OF, 24 September 2026), directing it to the formal authorisation procedure under Ecuador’s 2026 research regulation.
2026-08Reformulated our request to the Galápagos National Park Directorate: withdrew the original nursery source entirely and proposed sourcing endemic plant material directly from the Directorate’s own institutional nurseries or ex situ plantations for our in vitro propagation work with Invitrolab (Carta Ciudadano CIUDADANO-CIU-2026-53957, 25 August 2026). Response pending.
2026-08Requested guidance from the Galápagos National Park Directorate on transferring endemic plants — purchased from a licensed local nursery — to Invitrolab, our in vitro propagation partner in Quito, to begin developing standardized protocols for Scalesia and other priority species (Carta Ciudadano CIUDADANO-CIU-2026-50697, 11 August 2026).
2026-08Not funded by the Conservation, Food & Health Foundation. Around 1,000 applications were received and 35 went forward to full proposal; the Foundation also noted our status as a start-up organization. We said we would post outcomes either way. We will apply again in the 2027 cycle, with incorporation completed and co-funding confirmed.
2026-07Small-scale Rubus niveus extraction under way on private highland land, supplying resin and preservation trials.
2026-06The Galápagos Biosecurity Agency confirmed that no import procedure for edible fungi currently exists, and that a normative framework must be developed before our Pest Risk Analysis can be concluded (Oficio ABG-DVCB-2026-0319-O, 25 June 2026). No date has been given. Our fungal route waits; nothing else does.
2026-06Applications submitted to the Mohamed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund, the Conservation, Food & Health Foundation, the Galápagos Conservancy small grants programme, and the Fondation Prince Albert II de Monaco.
2026-06Discussions under way with a virtual-fencing manufacturer on managed grazing for blackberry regrowth control.
2026-05Pest Risk Analysis for the sporeless Pleurotus strain filed with the ABG.
2026-04Incorporation as an Ecuadorian Fundación is under way, with completion expected in late 2026.
2026-04Agreement with Invitrolab (Quito) to support development of in vitro propagation protocols for Scalesia pedunculata.
2025-10Process opened with the Galápagos Biosecurity Agency on the import of an edible fungal strain — reviewer nomination and preliminary procedural steps.

15 / Contact

Work with us

GHRI welcomes communication from grant-making organizations, conservation researchers, academic institutions, and community partners — for research collaboration, funding, and institutional inquiries.